Ummati Islamic Website
Related Articles
The group named Hezbullah confirmed yesterday, 28th September 2024, that its leader named Nasrullah has been killed in a Israeli airstrike. The Muslim world shockingly seems to abandon Islam in support of Palestine. Let us be clear, Palestine is not a religion, Palestine is a blessed landmark of Islam which the Qur’aan Shareef confirms in Suratul Israa, Chapter 17 in very first Aayah Al-Karimah. The abandoning of Islam to please those who are enemies of Allah Ta’alaa and His Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam is not a sign of Mu’min (Believing Muslim). Allah Ta’alaa says in Surah 58 in the very last verse (22):
“You will not find a nation believing in Allah and the last day befriending those who are the hard enemies against Allah and His messenger even though it may be their Fathers or their sons or their brothers or families”
This means under no circumstances can a believer befriend the enemies of Allah Ta’alaa and His Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam. The Shia object true Islam from their Kalimah right to their burials. They reject Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu’s status and companionship when Allah Ta’alaa has confirmed it in Surah at-Tawbah Verse 40. They reject the blessed wives of Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam and seek to taint the status of Sayyidah Aa’ishah Radhiyallahu ‘Anha when the Allah Ta’alaa has refuted this great slander upon our Mother Siddeeqah Radhiyallahu ‘Anha. So when you have rejected the true Ahlul-Bait and the exact bayt (house of Aaishah Radhiyallah ‘Anha) which Allah Ta’alaa has chosen for Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam and his two companions to rest in up until this day, can you still claim to be people of Imaan. There is enough evidence of Shia’s and their disbelief, however here we want to address certain specific issues.
- Where is the proof that the named Nasrullah (actions of Nasrush Shaytaan) confirms his status as a Shia?
Press play:
2. How is it possible for a disbeliever to help the cause of Palestine?
Allah Ta’alaa helps his Deen through people who are not Muslim too. Abu Taalib which again the Kuffar Shia claim died a Muslim helped the Deen of Islam, however died a non Muslim. Once again, Allah Ta’alaa testifies to this fact but the Kuffar Shia openly the defy the decree of Allah Ta’alaa and follow their desires to say Abu Taalib died a Muslim. Allah Ta’alaa addresses Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam regarding this in Suratul Qasas (28:56) confirming that Abu Taalib died on Kufr:
إِنَّكَ لاَ تَهْدِي مَنْ أَحْبَبْتَ وَلَكِنَّ اللَّهَ يَهْدِي مَنْ يَشَاءُ
“You cannot guide who you love but Allah guides whom He wishes”
Allah Ta’alaa does instructs Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam and those who have Imaan not to seek forgiveness for Abu Taalib or any disbeliever in Surah at-Tawbah, Verse 113:
‘It is not befitting for the Prophet (ﷺ) and those who believe that they should invoke (Allah) for forgiveness for the Mushrikeen.’
This all collectively is produced in most Saheeh Kitaab after the Qur’aan Majeed namely Saheeh Bukhaari in Hadith 4772. An extract from the Hadith is produced below testifying that Abu Taalib refused to say the Kalimah, La Ilaha Illallah
وَأَبَى أَنْ يَقُولُ لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ
In fact it is worthy of noting at this point that the Kuffar Shia even their own Kalimah which is different to the Muslimeen. Which religion instructs the curses of others to enter their Religion? Have a look:
It is safe to say, when Allah Ta’alaa and His Rasool Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam testifies that someone is truthful, the Kuffar Shia will oppose Allah Ta’alaa and His Rasool Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam and declare them as disbelievers and team up to slander them. In the same breath, when Allah Ta’alaa and His Rasool Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam declare someone as disbelievers, they will team up and declare them believers. Are these hypocrites or believers?
This point is reiterated again in another Hadith of Saheeh Bukhaari where a person who was declared by Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam a person of the fire also assisted in the major battle against Jews, the battle of Khaybar (7AH). The fire destined person seemed to be a Muslim the courageous way he was fighting in the battle, however Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam instructed Sayyiduna Bilaal Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu to announce:
لا يَدْخُلُ الجَنَّةَ إلَّا مُؤْمِنٌ، وإنَّ اللَّهَ لَيُؤَيِّدُ هذا الدِّينَ بالرَّجُلِ الفاجِرِ
‘None will enter Paradise but a Muslim, and Allah may support this religion (i.e. Islam) even with a flagrantly disobodient man’
Sahih al-Bukhari 3062
In short it is not permissible to send any form of condolences for Nasrushaytaan or express any emotions for his ending as an enemy of Allah Ta’alaa and Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam. Thus do not fall for their deception. In fact Shiasm was after all started by a Jew, Abdullah b. Sabaa. Do not take our word for it, search in their book, Rijaalul Kashi:
Do not express no sadness for the Kuffaar. Allah Ta’alaa makes this clear in Surah Tawbah, Verse 84:
وَلَا تُصَلِّ عَلَىٰٓ أَحَدٍۢ مِّنْهُم مَّاتَ أَبَدًۭا وَلَا تَقُمْ عَلَىٰ قَبْرِهِۦٓ ۖ إِنَّهُمْ كَفَرُوا۟ بِٱللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِۦ وَمَاتُوا۟ وَهُمْ فَـٰسِقُونَ
“And do not ever offer ˹funeral˺ prayers for any of their dead, nor stand by their grave ˹at burial˺, for they have lost faith in Allah and His Messenger and died rebellious.“
You say Hezbullah! They stole this name from the Qur’aan Shareef which is clearly defines Sahaabah Radhiyallahu ‘Anhum but they rejected this title and attached it to themselves just like how Abdullah b. Sabaa’s (the founder of Shiasm) name is Abdullah (Slave of Allah Ta’alaa) but in essence he was Abdush-Shaytaan. Thus Hezbullah in essence is Hezbush Shaytaan.
