A Response to Ml Sulaiman Moola’s ‘Difference of Opinion’ Claim

Bismillahir Rahmaanir Raheem

The audio floating around seems to be the message of unity once again.

To set the theme of this article, we have to set our minds correct. Mufti Ebrahim Salejee حفظه الله said regarding some aspects, “We will agree to disagree“.

Moulana Sulaiman Moola claims:

Can we possibly compare ourselves to Khayrul Quroon?

Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam said (what we hear every Jumu’ah) and according to the words of Muslim Shareef:

‏”‏ خَيْرُ النَّاسِ قَرْنِي ثُمَّ الَّذِينَ يَلُونَهُمْ ثُمَّ الَّذِينَ يَلُونَهم”‏

The best among people are of my generation, then those next to them. Then there would follow after them such persons whose evidence would precede the oath, and in case of some others, the oath (would precede) the evidence.

البخاري (2652) في الشهادات، ومسلم (2533) في فضائل الصحابة:

This Hadith is placed under the chapter of the virtues of Sahabah Radhiyalluhu Anhum. Love proves itself when someone abuses your beloved then you do not mind going all out on all platforms defending them openly, making their enemies known. Their is absolutely no difference of opinion about those who abuse the status of Sahabah Radhiyalluhu Anhum. How come one cannot go on platforms and say for once the reality of the haters of Sahabah Radhiyalluhu Anhum, the vile Kuffaar Shia? There was an opportunity to unite but silence was the chosen decision on their reality and infact one chose to despise the friends of Allah Ta’ala.

However, focusing on the issue – the twist and manipulation of the Haqq, did the Sahabah Radhiyalluhu Anhum or the Tabi’een رحمهم الله ever encourage young children to go to Church and stand under the cross? I am sorry to say but the understanding of Fiqh, the true Tafaqquh is missing with only one thing that remains:

“Protection of the flock on baatil no matter how wrong they are”

Understanding the meaning of pride as explained by Menk Saheb: when the Haqq is brought front, we reject it but exactly that’s what is done. One despises those that remind of the Haqq and the baatil agenda. Platforms are used to campaign the interfaith agenda and then to play the guilt game, it is made to seem like there is a difference of opinion.

When the Jamiatul Ulama South Africa adulterated the grand old age interpretation of Suratul Kaafiroon to make interfaith acceptable, their kufr was endorsed. Allah Ta’ala’s Kalaam vs Jamiat’s adulterated kalaam and theirs were given preference? All major Darul Uloom’s along with seniors and experts in the field said this interpretation is totally devious and strange. Surah al- Kaafiroon infact smacks the interfaith ideology to smithereens. But it is bypassed by claiming there are “differences of opinions”.

Let’s look at the result of the interfaith that you endorse in the name of “differences of opinions” and this is done in our Muslim schools:

Yet this is called a difference of opinion?? Would one allow and would one be pleased to know that your daughter stood in the Church under a cross smiling for a selfie?? If your answer is no, then let me frank, that is someone’s daughter which we respect as ours and we deem it 100% necessary to defend the Haqq so they are saved even if this agenda is pursued by whomsoever.

The Quraan Majeed invokes hatred for the Kuffaar and their ways and you are saying all this: there is a difference of opinion? There is supposed to be hatred for the cross and you are calling us to stand under the cross saying there is a difference of opinion?

You are defending these compadre’s at the expense of our children standing and smiling under a cross?

Does one understand the severity of this crime? Does one even know what does a cross mean?

Standing under the cross smiling and encouraging our children to do so in the name of Islamic Schools under the banner of interfaith and then too, with no force but rather as a happy day out on an excursion.

Smiling under a cross means you are happy with it. Smiling under a cross is symbolic. Smiling under a cross means you are fine with Jesus as a son of God and that crucifixion took place? Inna lillah wa Inna ilayhi raji’un, when the Qur’aan Shareef totally rejects this!

Allah Ta’ala refers to it as “monstrous” and one says it is merely a difference of opinion? Inna lillahi wa Inna ilayhi raji’un

Quran – Surah No. 18 الكهف
Ayah No. 5

Translation:
Grave is the word that comes out of their mouths. They say nothing but a lie.

Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said,

“The Hour will not be established until the son of Mariam (Radhiyallahu Anha) (i.e. Sayyidina Isa Alaihis Salaam) descends amongst you as a just ruler, he will break the cross, kill the pigs, and abolish the Jizya tax. Money will be in abundance so that nobody will accept it (as charitable gifts).

Bukhari

Do we need to be reminded constantly of the change of the old syllabus of the old Jamiat so that your universal religion called interfaith can now become a reality? Strange you would save your own children from it but expose the rest with open arms. Is that not how Rothschild and the Drug lords of this world operate?

Read the last paragraph again:

This Surah very beautiful explains that we could engage interfaith relations….”

Did your old syllabus contain this? Well let’s have a look for ourselves:

Why did you (JUSA) remove these beautiful words of Haqq. Read the ” lesson to be learnt ” and you advised us not to have pride and you even defined pride as rejection of Haqq. So here is the Haqq penned down once upon a time in your old syllabus. Now don’t reject and accept that you have adulterated your own words to promote a new type of religion which is not Islam. Stop with the difference of opinion statement. This is messing with Allah Ta’ala’s Kalaam and you will lose your Emaan if you endorse such “MONSTROUS” opinions. Read above at your own lesson you once taught this Ummah:

“One should not compromise one’s principles by accepting false and baatil values. This cannot be understood as tolerance because tolerance does not mean to accept falsehood”

What was the need to change that?

Show us incidents in the lives of Sahabah Radhiyalluhu Anhum where they went to pray like this:

https://awakeoummah.com/2023/10/21/2238/

Show us incidents where Sahabah Radhiyalluhu Anhum and the Tabieen رحمهم الله promoted like this:

Read clearly the names of above and enough is said for today, it is time for you to go and read who is the Zionist Warren Goldstein!

You defend the people you share values with, if not you would oppose their alien views openly!

Still not enough?

Did Sahaabah Radhiyallahu Anhum and the Tabieen رحمهم الله inaugurate multi faith centre’s?

Do you base it on the majority? Well what does the Quraan Majeed say about your definition of majority?

Quran – Surah No. 6 الأنعام

Ayah No. 116

Translation:

And if you obey the majority of those on earth, they will make you lose the way of Allah. They follow nothing but whims, and they do nothing but make conjectures.

No do not interpolate the meaning of the above verse:

Check Also

Professor David Miller Exposes Jamiat SA’s Interfaith Promotions

The Foisting Interfaith Affair For more information on JUSA’S Foisting Interfaith Affairs access the link …

0:00
0:00
Open chat
Assalamualykum